- Home
- Employer Resource Hub
- How much time is your school REALLY spending on caretaker recruitment?
How much time is your school REALLY spending on caretaker recruitment?
Every school leader knows the importance of having a reliable caretaker in place. Without one, sites feel the strain, teachers and staff are stretched, and the wider school community notices the difference. What often goes unnoticed, however, is the time senior leaders spend on filling the role.
From drafting adverts to shortlisting, interviewing, and compliance checks, recruitment is far more than just a one-off task. The question is: how much leadership time is really being lost along the way?
Contents
30 Hidden Hours
When broken down step by step, in-house recruitment can take senior leaders up to 30 hours of their own time. That includes:
- Writing and approving the job ad
- Posting vacancies and managing applications
- Scheduling and running interviews
- Contacting referees and carrying out DBS checks
- Preparing offer paperwork, inductions, and training plans
And that’s before notice periods and onboarding delays add weeks of further disruption. For a busy leadership team, 30 hours can mean a whole week’s worth of strategic time lost to admin.
Find out how 30 hours of leadership time is being lost
Over two months of disruption
Even once an offer has been made to a successful applicant, schools often face extended disruption. Notice periods, safeguarding vetting, and training requirements can leave a site short-staffed for more than 10 weeks.
In that time, senior leaders frequently find themselves stepping in to cover urgent site issues - everything from opening and securing the building to unblocking toilets and repairing furniture. Tasks that take attention away from what matters most: teaching, learning, and school improvement.
How the impact multiplies across MATs
For a single school, 30 hours and two months of disruption is a challenge. But in a multi-academy trust, those numbers multiply. If just a handful of schools are hiring, the cumulative effect can equate to months of lost productivity time across the trust.
That’s valuable time that could otherwise be spent delivering improvement plans, supporting staff, and focusing on pupil outcomes.

A smarter way forward
The reality is that recruitment disruption doesn’t have to be inevitable. Schools and trusts that look carefully at their current processes often uncover surprising opportunities to save time and reduce risk.
For many leaders, there are three big challenges:
- Finding candidates who are the right fit for the school
- Managing the recruitment process itself
- Preventing repeated recruitment cycles when a new hire withdraws or isn’t the right fit - a situation that can double both disruption and cost
By focusing on these areas, schools and trusts can cut months of operational interruption down to under two weeks. The result is less time spent firefighting site issues, and more time for leaders to focus on what really matters: driving teaching and learning forward.

Download the full report
We’ve put together a detailed breakdown of the hidden costs of caretaker recruitment, uncovering where leadership time is really being lost and how schools can take back control of the process.
Inside, you’ll find:
- A step-by-step breakdown of how 30 hours of leadership time is wasted during in-house recruitment.
- The amount of disruption a single school can experience to in-house recruitment.
- The ripple effect recruitment delays can have across multi-academy trusts.
- Real examples of how schools are reducing disruption and filling roles in a fraction of the time.
By approaching recruitment differently, schools and trusts can save weeks of leadership time, reduce risk, and avoid the disruption that comes with vacancies dragging on.
Uncover the hidden costs of in-house caretaker recruitment